RESUMO
In the evolving landscape of clinical Natural Language Generation (NLG), assessing abstractive text quality remains challenging, as existing methods often overlook generative task complexities. This work aimed to examine the current state of automated evaluation metrics in NLG in healthcare. To have a robust and well-validated baseline with which to examine the alignment of these metrics, we created a comprehensive human evaluation framework. Employing ChatGPT-3.5-turbo generative output, we correlated human judgments with each metric. None of the metrics demonstrated high alignment; however, the SapBERT score-a Unified Medical Language System (UMLS)- showed the best results. This underscores the importance of incorporating domain-specific knowledge into evaluation efforts. Our work reveals the deficiency in quality evaluations for generated text and introduces our comprehensive human evaluation framework as a baseline. Future efforts should prioritize integrating medical knowledge databases to enhance the alignment of automated metrics, particularly focusing on refining the SapBERT score for improved assessments.
RESUMO
Applying methods in natural language processing on electronic health records (EHR) data is a growing field. Existing corpus and annotation focus on modeling textual features and relation prediction. However, there is a paucity of annotated corpus built to model clinical diagnostic thinking, a process involving text understanding, domain knowledge abstraction and reasoning. This work introduces a hierarchical annotation schema with three stages to address clinical text understanding, clinical reasoning, and summarization. We created an annotated corpus based on an extensive collection of publicly available daily progress notes, a type of EHR documentation that is collected in time series in a problem-oriented format. The conventional format for a progress note follows a Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan heading (SOAP). We also define a new suite of tasks, Progress Note Understanding, with three tasks utilizing the three annotation stages. The novel suite of tasks was designed to train and evaluate future NLP models for clinical text understanding, clinical knowledge representation, inference, and summarization.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To provide a scoping review of papers on clinical natural language processing (NLP) shared tasks that use publicly available electronic health record data from a cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched 6 databases, including biomedical research and computer science literature databases. A round of title/abstract screening and full-text screening were conducted by 2 reviewers. Our method followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 35 papers with 48 clinical NLP tasks met inclusion criteria between 2007 and 2021. We categorized the tasks by the type of NLP problems, including named entity recognition, summarization, and other NLP tasks. Some tasks were introduced as potential clinical decision support applications, such as substance abuse detection, and phenotyping. We summarized the tasks by publication venue and dataset type. DISCUSSION: The breadth of clinical NLP tasks continues to grow as the field of NLP evolves with advancements in language systems. However, gaps exist with divergent interests between the general domain NLP community and the clinical informatics community for task motivation and design, and in generalizability of the data sources. We also identified issues in data preparation. CONCLUSION: The existing clinical NLP tasks cover a wide range of topics and the field is expected to grow and attract more attention from both general domain NLP and clinical informatics community. We encourage future work to incorporate multidisciplinary collaboration, reporting transparency, and standardization in data preparation. We provide a listing of all the shared task papers and datasets from this review in a GitLab repository.
